An introduction to Orcasound &
underwater noise indicators for Puget Sound

Scott Veirs, Orcasound hydrophone network

Marine Waters Workgroup meeting, Aug 18, 2021 (remote)

Slides at: orcasound.net/talks

Existing hydrophone network
Assets that could help implement a underwater noise indicator within the Marine Water Quality Vital Sign

Outline (focus on real-time, continuous assets in WA):

  1. Non-WA, Non-Orcasound assets you should know about
  2. Orcasound: a tool for SRKW+ research, management, and education
  3. Orcasound: a tool for characterizing underwater noise in critical habitat of Southern Resident killer whales (SRKWs)
  4. Vital Sign Revision Project and potential noise indicators
About me:

Non-WA or Non-Orcasound assets...

...that could help implement noise indicators, establish baselines, and monitor noise levels
  • Other cabled, real-time hydrophone assets in the Northeast Pacific
    1. Canadian whale tracking infrastructure ($10M+ investments by ONC; DFO, ECHO, SIMRES++)
    2. Lime Kiln Lighthouse - SMRU and The Whale Museum
    3. Outer coast U.S. assets ($100M investments: e.g OOI Newport node, MARS, U.S. Navy)
  • Autonomous recorders or other non-real-time hydrophones
    1. Critical habitat NOAA assets (PALs, EARS, etc.)
    2. Many past deployments in SRKW habitat (APL/PALs, MARUs, HARPs, JASCO/SMRU, SoundTraps, etc.)
    3. Deployments on SRKWs (DTAGs)
  • Other real-time sources of SRKW detections and/or non-cabled audio: wavegliders (humpbacks); SMRU CABs
  • Vast and growing network of Salish Sea marine sensors, e.g. acoustic gliders (NANOOS/NVS)

Orcasound

An evolving tool for SRKW conservation

The product of ~20 years of community scientists listening for whales, Orcasound is now a cooperative hydrophone network and an open source hardware/software project.

Orcasound 2021 map and membership

Cooperative of researchers, educators, & community scientists
  1. Orca Network
  2. Port Townsend Marine Science Center
  3. Beam Reach & Colorado College
  4. The Center for Whale Research
  5. The Whale Trail
  6. Oceans Initiative
  7. Orca Behavior Institute
  8. Whale Scout
  9. Deep Green Wilderness
  10. Friends of Lime Kiln Society (FOLKS)
  11. Cetacean Research Technology
  12. Pacific Mammal Research
  13. LAB-core System Hydrophones
  14. Vashon Nature Center
  15. Sound Action (2021 pilot node on Vashon)

Physical exhibits include: Seattle Aquarium; Port Townsend Marine Science Center; Langley Whale Center; Lime Kiln Visitor's Center (via FOLKS)

Past | Current | Planned (2022)

You can join Orcasound, too! Just e-sign the MOA and heed the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license.

Orcasound hardware evolution

A listening node for less than $1000 (U.S.)!

Basic ingredients (and costs):

  • ($ 50) DIY stand
  • ($300 x2) Hydrophones -- dual for redundancy, stereo listening, & bearing
  • ($125) Pisound board -- 48/96/192 kHz/channel, stereo 24-bit ADC
  • ($ 35) Raspberry Pi 3b+/4 -- single board computer
  • ($ 35) Audio cables & waterproof box installed near the shoreline
  • ($ 75) Power over Ethernet -- from box to 24-hour UPS & Internet router

60% of cost is hydrophones!

DIY Guide: How to build your own hydrophone node!

Research nodes cost 5-10x more...
...for calibrated hydrophones sensitive from 10 Hz - 100 kHz.

Orcasound software evolution

2017 challenge: Can we make it easy to listen, cloud-based, & scalable?

Free open-source software to stream audio that "just works" on all devices/browsers

Amazon S3 for archiving data in the cloud

Orcanode Github repository

What's next for Orcasound?

Make “listening for whales” interactive and inform real-time end-users

For free live-listening, browse to: live.orcasound.net

Orcasound 1.0 player published Nov., 2018. Orcasound 2.0 launched fall, 2019.

Version 3.0 now in beta testing includes dynamic map, moderation UI, and new notification features.

Orcasound for characterizing vessel noise

The bad news: Vessel noise dominates in Puget Sound & can mask both calls & clicks
Frequencies of vessel noise overlap
with SRKW hearing and signals

Veirs, Veirs, & Wood (2016, PeerJ)

Typical ship:

Squeaky ship:

Vessel noise mitigation

The good news: there are many ways to "more than mitigate" vessel noise.

Operational (temporary) and technological (permanent) options (see Williams+2019)

The Quiet Sound program will consider these options for Puget Sound commercial ships.

Orcasound's Shipnoise.net project developed a prototype in Dec., 2020, for ranking ships based on how much they raise noise levels above a node's "urban ambient" baseline level.

Broadband received level peaks

Ships and boats have similar maxima, but ships last longer

Validating noise peaks & speed with AIS, cameras, and radar

Slow boats have lower maxima, but usually last longer than fast boats...

Images from the U.Vic./NEMES automated camera at Orcasound Lab. Smooth curve (black) is 1200-second running average broadband dB level. Now also tracking boat type & speed with M2 AIS/radar/camera system./p>

Monitoring ship noise in SRKW habitat

Urban ambient noise level: a baseline for "delta" noise metrics

Maximum received noise level vs duration From ASA 2019 talk by V.Veirs with ref. to Holt et al., 2017, "Noise levels received by endangered killer whales..."

Monitoring aircraft noise in Seattle

Orcasound ambient noise studies

Across Puget Sound, mean noise levels vary seasonally & geographically.

Hourly means (of 2-second samples) at Orcasound Lab vary seasonally during daytime "boating hours" (11 a.m. to sunset)

Spatial varition in annual (2008) mean broadband noise levels.

Source: Beam Reach reports to NOAA (2006-2008)

Precedents and ideas for underwater noise indicators

  1. Exceedance of old NOAA threshold for harrassment by chronic noise (120 dB broadband receive level)
  2. European standard for long-term (annual) Good Environmental Status
    • <100 dB for annual mean 63 Hz 1/3-octave band level
    • <100 dB for annual mean 125 Hz 1/3-octave band level
  3. Threshold relative to ambient noise statistical baseline (e.g. "urban ambient" of Veirs & Veirs, 2016)
  4. Metrics developed for particular species and acoustic impacts (e.g. masking of SRKW echolocation; orca-weighted decibels)

European low-frequency standards (Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Tasker et al., 2010).

Questions?

Zones of bioacoustic impact from noise

  1. Injury (acoustic trauma, or stranding)
  2. Deafening (permanent or temporary threshold shift)
  3. Behavioral change (can also be due to physical proximity or interference)
  4. Masking of signals and cues
  5. Stress (e.g. from chronic noise)
  6. Audibility

Potential impacts of noise on southern resident killer whales (SRKWs)

  1. Injury (L112? J34?)
  2. Stranding (observed in other toothed whales, but not SRKWs)
  3. Deafening (permanent or temporary)
    • What explosives were used near SRKWs during the capture era, and previously?
    • Pile driving?
    • MFA sonar: (HMS Ottawa, 2012)
    • Naval detonations: (HMS Ottawa, 2012)
  4. Behavioral change (can also be due to physical proximity or interference)
  5. Masking of signals and cues (mostly by vessels)
  6. Stress (e.g. from chronic noise)
Right whale stress fell after 9/11 decreased ship noise in 2001 (Rolland et al., 2012)

/